Z
prev.
play.
mark.
next.

1:32:01
gives the opposition
fuel for subversive action.

1:32:04
- You've sided with them?
- It's not a prolongation.

1:32:08
It's a totally new case.
1:32:10
Some points are awkward
but the case is clear!

1:32:15
On the contrary.
1:32:16
We began with an accident
and 2 drunks...

1:32:19
Some ice, dear!
1:32:22
Their testimony
coincides in detail.

1:32:26
Confirmed by the Chinaman!
1:32:29
Next day, the autopsy says
death was due to a blow by a club.

1:32:34
A 2nd autopsy will say no,
1:32:36
and a confirmation'll disprove
the initial autopsy!

1:32:40
I'd had no time
1:32:42
to examine this new theory
1:32:44
when a witness says
it was an assassination.

1:32:47
Based on a vague discussion!
1:32:51
On his way to see me,
the witness is clubbed

1:32:55
- and is still in the hospital!
- What do you mean?

1:32:58
I'm only stating facts.
1:33:02
Then comes the reporter. He's not
a militant and that's important!

1:33:07
I learn
Yago and Vago belong to CROC,

1:33:13
the Christian Royalist...
1:33:15
I know, I know...
1:33:17
...along with the assailant
of the 2nd senator

1:33:20
and most of those
at the demonstration.

1:33:23
It seems the police know
and use them as auxiliaries

1:33:26
to maintain order for state visits.
1:33:30
That's yet to be proven,
1:33:32
like the fact
that the Police Col.

1:33:35
drove this man
to the demonstration.

1:33:38
Really!
1:33:39
He wouldn't be involved
with such a person!

1:33:42
Not openly! No one'll believe it!
1:33:47
My conclusion is this:
1:33:50
As a case of drunken driving,
it's simple

1:33:54
but impossible.
1:33:56
If we accept
the premeditated act of a group


prev.
next.