:25:00
Great. That would be very,
very comfortable. Yeah.
:25:03
It could be.
:25:07
Actually,
I came in here to save you...
:25:10
from making a big mistake
with that older guy.
:25:14
Really?
:25:17
So I could make a bigger one
with a young guy like yourself?
:25:23
Maybe.
:25:26
I've got to be at work
early in the morning.
:25:28
Then what are you doing here?
:25:32
Your friend was magnificent.
:25:39
Naw.
:25:42
JESTER: You'll also be trained
and evaluated...
:25:44
by a few civilian specialists.
:25:46
The civilians are here...
:25:48
because they are our best source
of information on enemy planes.
:25:51
One of the most qualified
is our T.A.G.R.E.P.--
:25:54
call sign, Charlie.
:25:55
She has a Ph.D.
in astrophysics...
:25:57
and she's also
a civilian contractor...
:25:59
so you don't salute her,
but you better listen to her...
:26:02
because the Pentagon listens
to her about your proficiency.
:26:05
It's all yours, Charlie.
:26:06
Thank you.
:26:08
Hello. We will be dealing
with F-5s and A-4s...
:26:12
as our MlG simulators.
:26:14
Now, then,
as most of you know...
:26:16
the F-5 doesn't have
the thrust to weight ratio...
:26:20
that the MlG-28 has...
:26:22
and it doesn't bleed energy
below 300 knots like a MlG-28.
:26:26
However, the MlG-28
does have a problem...
:26:30
with its inverted flight tanks.
:26:32
It won't do
a negative "G" pushover.
:26:35
The latest intelligence
tells us...
:26:37
that the most it will do
is one negative--
:26:40
Excuse me, Lieutenant.
:26:42
Is there something wrong?
:26:45
Yes, ma'am. The data on
the MlG is inaccurate.
:26:49
How's that, Lieutenant?
:26:51
I just happened
to see a MlG-28.
:26:54
We! We.
:26:55
Sorry, Goose.
:26:56
We happened to see a MlG-28
do a four "G" negative dive.