:40:00
Opposing counsel's not suggested anything
that justifies keeping Mr. Grazier on the stand.
:40:06
- Isn't it time to move on?
- I'm leaning in that direction.
:40:10
Please get to the point.
:40:11
Mr. Grazier, do you know of
the existence, now or in the past,
:40:16
of a report calling into question
the safety of the Meridian model?
:40:19
I can't testify on some hypothetical report.
:40:23
It wasn't hypothetical to Dr. Pavel.
He wrote it.
:40:26
- So he says.
- So he says under oath.
:40:32
Do you understand, sir,
that you are testifying under oath?
:40:35
- Yes, I do.
- And that perjury is grounds for disbarment?
:40:38
Mr. Ward, I find that objectionable.
I do know the law.
:40:42
So do I. You're using semantics when
all you have to do is answer a question.
:40:47
- Did you see that report? Yes or no?
- Objection! The question has been answered.
:40:52
- It's been asked and has not been answered.
- Overruled.
:40:55
Yes or no? I think you're being evasive!
:40:58
I'm not.
I'm answering the questions you're asking.
:41:00
The hell you are! You know that,
I know that, the jury knows that.
:41:05
- Mr. Ward...
- Everybody in this courtroom knows it.
:41:08
- Mr. Ward, sit down.
- That son of bitch is getting to the jury.
:41:12
No. He's only bluffing.
He did the same thing in Wrangell v Kincaid.
:41:17
- I can handle this.
- Then do it.
:41:20
Miss Ward?
:41:25
Mr. Grazier, Mr. Ward has been
thundering on for quite some time now.
:41:30
It occurs to me that, with all his fire and
brimstone, he might have confused the issue.
:41:35
I'd like to ask you a simple question,
straight out.
:41:39
Have you any knowledge of a report
calling any version of the Meridian unsafe?
:41:46
No.
:41:50
Have you ever seen one,
read one or heard of one?
:41:57
No.