:48:00
He wants someone to pay.
:48:06
Thank you.
:48:24
Andrew Beckett represented
your firm in 1990, is that correct?
:48:28
- That's correct.
-were you pleased with his work?
:48:32
We were satisfied
with the outcome of the litigation.
:48:38
Satisfied.
:48:42
Mr. Laird, you gave me sworn
testimony in your deposition.
:48:49
- Is that correct?
- Correct.
:48:53
You said you were impressed
and delighted with Beckett's work.
:49:00
Do you recall saying that?
:49:09
In all honesty I was delighted
with aspects of Andy's efforts.
:49:16
But in general, I found the work
to be merely satisfactory.
:49:28
Do you agree ...
:49:32
... that a baloney sandwich
is a satisfactory meal?
:49:36
Whereas, caviar and champagne,
roast duck and baked Alaska ...
:49:42
... might be considered delightful?
:49:45
We object. These gastronomical
comments are irrelevant.
:49:50
Five months ago you characterised
Andrew Beckett as caviar.
:49:56
Now he's a baloney sandwich.