1:09:00
This drawing can tell you
nothing about...
1:09:03
...the murderer. It only tells you
about the child who drew it.
1:09:07
Without more information, I don't
think I can be of any value to you.
1:09:12
Humor me, doc.
1:09:15
Consider this a working hypothesis
and assume for the moment...
1:09:20
...that this is a drawing
of the murderer.
1:09:27
Well.
1:09:31
Your giant certainly looks
tall, massive...
1:09:34
...very imposing.
1:09:36
If this depicts the relationship
between the giant and the girl...
1:09:39
...then these things
you call "porcupines"...
1:09:42
...appear to be gifts
that she's accepting.
1:09:44
That's implying a trust.
1:09:46
Was the girl in Monash
killed the same way?
1:09:52
Exactly the same.
1:09:53
Do the victims resemble one another?
1:09:58
Yes, a lot.
1:10:00
What were the time intervals
between the murders?
1:10:04
The Monash County case was
eight years ago.
1:10:08
The little girl missing, three.
1:10:10
And Ginny was just....
Just last winter.
1:10:14
So the intervals are getting shorter.
1:10:18
If that's the case, then yes,
you could--
1:10:21
Remember, this is a hypothetical case.
1:10:24
But yes, you could expect
another incident within...
1:10:28
...a matter of months.
1:10:30
Maybe a year,
if the opportunity arose.
1:10:34
But this could just be a product...
1:10:36
...of a 7-year-old child's
imagination.
1:10:45
Right.
1:10:54
You came to me for help.
1:10:57
- Yes.
- Mind if I ask you some questions?