1:12:00
- Yes
- Isn't that rather strong language?
1:12:05
Yes, it is. What we feel
about Munch's painting is expressed
1:12:11
in a footnote I added personally
to our review:
1:12:17
"It is true that the public is annoyed
by these disgusting works.
1:12:23
"How regrettable then that
such exhibitions draw full houses.
1:12:29
"An empty gallery would be the best way
to control these extravagances."
1:12:36
I agree with Aftenposten.
This is not art, it is dirt.
1:13:12
For the next 14 years,
1:13:14
Edvard Munch is to lead a life
of increasing pain and isolation.
1:13:19
His illness, aggravated by smoking
and alcohol, is to grow worse.
1:13:25
He is torn by the themes
of jealousy and suffering,
1:13:29
by the thought of
his own death
1:13:31
and his descent into a literal hell.
1:13:50
The conservative press is to
continue its attacks on his work
1:13:53
and, other than for periods
spent at Åsgårdstrand,
1:13:57
where he once met
with Mrs. Heiberg,