Judgment at Nuremberg
prev.
play.
mark.
next.

:30:02
that saw me through the war.
:30:05
You have been somebody to look up to,
for all of us.

:30:12
Is that all, Herr Rolfe?
:30:18
Yes.
:30:19
Thank you.
:30:30
Dr. Wieck, do you know the defendant,
Ernst Janning?

:30:37
Yes, I know him.
:30:39
Will you tell us in what capacity?
:30:42
We served in the Ministry of Justice together
from 1929 till 1935.

:30:47
Did you know him before that?
:30:49
Yes.
:30:51
He was a law student of mine.
:30:53
- Did you know him well?
- Yes.

:30:55
- Was he a protégé of yours?
- Yes.

:30:56
Why?
:30:59
He was always a man of great intelligence.
:31:03
He was a man born with the qualities
of a great legal mind.

:31:11
Would you tell us
from your own experience...

:31:15
the position of the judge in Germany
prior to the advent of Adolf Hitler.

:31:21
The position of the judge
was one of complete independence.

:31:26
Now, would you describe
the contrast, if any...

:31:30
after the coming to power
of National Socialism in 1933?

:31:34
Judges became subject
to something outside of objective justice.

:31:40
They became subject to what was necessary
for the protection of the country.

:31:45
Would you explain this, please?
:31:47
The first consideration of the judge...
:31:49
became the punishment of acts
against the state...

:31:53
rather than objective consideration
of the case.

:31:56
And what other changes were there?
:31:59
The right to appeal was eliminated.

prev.
next.