Judgment at Nuremberg
prev.
play.
mark.
next.

:50:04
Mrs. Bertholt. How did she react to all this?
:50:08
Madame Bertholt is a very fine woman,
Your Honor.

:50:11
I'm sure she is. What about her husband?
:50:16
He was in the army.
:50:18
What happened to him?
:50:22
He was one of the defendants
in the Malmedy Case.

:50:29
General Bertholt. Karl Bertholt.
:50:34
He was executed, Your Honor.
:50:39
Yes, I know that.
:50:44
The document then states that
the photographer, Rudolf Lenz...

:50:47
is requested to present himself
within two weeks...

:50:50
at one the hospitals mentioned below...
:50:53
for medical treatment.
:50:56
Next, prosecution presents
affidavit document no. 488...

:51:00
which concerns the seamstress,
Anni Meunch.

:51:02
Document reads as follows:
:51:05
"District Court, Frankfurt am Main,
has decided the following:

:51:08
"The seamstress, Anni Meunch,
daughter of Wilhelm Meunch...

:51:10
"is to be sterilized.
:51:12
"She is therefore requested
to present herself within two weeks...

:51:15
"at one of the hospitals mentioned below.
:51:18
"If she does not take herself voluntarily...
:51:20
"she will be taken by force. "
:51:23
Next, document no. 449...
:51:25
interrogatories in the German
and English text...

:51:29
concerning the farmer's helper,
Meyer Eichinger.

:51:31
Your Honor...
:51:36
defense objects to introduction
of these repetitive documents.

:51:40
According to the ruling
of the first tribunal...

:51:43
such documents are not even admissible...
:51:45
unless supported by independent evidence
of their authenticity.

:51:50
Objection sustained.
:51:53
Your Honor,
may I ask the defense a question?

:51:56
Yes.
:51:58
Would evidence on sterilization
be admissible if there were a witness?


prev.
next.