1:17:00
a member of the canine family
was involved.
1:17:03
In your opinion, is there any evidence
suggesting the child was not killed
1:17:07
by a member of the canine family?
1:17:09
There is evidence to suggest there was
an incised wound around the neck.
1:17:13
In other words, a cut throat.
1:17:15
(public gasps)
1:17:19
This photograph was taken
using ultraviolet light.
1:17:22
You can see the pattern
of bloodied fingers.
1:17:27
And here, what may be a thumb. Its
the impression of a hand of a small adult.
1:17:33
- Thats a thumb?
- If thats a hand, Im a virgin.
1:17:38
Would you align your finger along the
mark that impressed Professor Cameron?
1:17:45
I object to that. The hand is flat.
1:17:48
Noted.
1:17:50
How many smudges do you see?
1:17:53
One, two, three, four.
1:17:56
Would you hold your finger up, please?
1:17:59
One, two, three.
1:18:11
Were gonna take some of the wind out
of Professor Camerons sails tomorrow.
1:18:15
- Were gonna bring up the Confait case.
- Whats that?
1:18:18
This bloke Confait
was murdered in England.
1:18:21
Three boys were sent to prison for life,
based on Professor Camerons evidence.
1:18:27
Three years later, the evidence was totally
discredited and the boys were freed.
1:18:32
Turns out theyd been nowhere
near the place at the time of death.
1:18:39
The media are gonna be pleased.
I gotta go to the loo again.
1:18:42
Decoy time.
1:18:48
- Here she comes!
- Its not her.
1:18:53
Professor Cameron, when you gave
evidence in the Confait case,
1:18:56
you werent armed with the correct
knowledge of the circumstances.