A Cry in the Dark

1:18:11

We’re gonna take some of the wind out
of Professor Cameron’s sails tomorrow.

1:18:15

- We’re gonna bring up the Confait case.
- What’s that?

1:18:18

This bloke Confait
was murdered in England.

1:18:21

Three boys were sent to prison for life,
based on Professor Cameron’s evidence.

1:18:27

Three years later, the evidence was totally
discredited and the boys were freed.

1:18:32

Turns out they’d been nowhere
near the place at the time of death.

1:18:39

The media are gonna be pleased.
I gotta go to the loo again.

1:18:42

Decoy time.

1:18:48

- Here she comes!
- It’s not her.

1:18:53

Professor Cameron, when you gave
evidence in the Confait case,

1:18:56

you weren’t armed with the correct
knowledge of the circumstances.

1:19:00

I agree entirely.

1:19:03

I want to suggest you have done
the same thing in this case.

1:19:06

I should like to show
the professor photograph 10B.

1:19:10

Would you call that a neat bundle?

1:19:13

No.

1:19:15

Did you swear
”I rely entirely on Dr Scott’s evidence

1:19:19

that there was no saliva present
on the jump suit?”

1:19:22

Correct.

1:19:24

Yet Dr Scott states “There is no
guarantee there is no saliva elsewhere.”

1:19:29

There was no saliva
present on the samples.

1:19:32

He said “There is no guarantee
there is no saliva elsewhere.”

1:19:38

I would accept that.

1:19:42

In court, John Phillips QC
told how evidence

1:19:45

presented by Professor Cameron
in a London murder trial was discredited.

1:19:49

That’s silly, sweetheart. Gran loves you.

1:19:52

- She won’t let me play outside.
- She’s just doing what Mummy told her.

1:19:57

It’s too dangerous
for you to play outside now.