1:19:00
I agree entirely.
1:19:03
I want to suggest you have done
the same thing in this case.
1:19:06
I should like to show
the professor photograph 10B.
1:19:10
Would you call that a neat bundle?
1:19:13
No.
1:19:15
Did you swear
I rely entirely on Dr Scotts evidence
1:19:19
that there was no saliva present
on the jump suit?
1:19:22
Correct.
1:19:24
Yet Dr Scott states There is no
guarantee there is no saliva elsewhere.
1:19:29
There was no saliva
present on the samples.
1:19:32
He said There is no guarantee
there is no saliva elsewhere.
1:19:38
I would accept that.
1:19:42
In court, John Phillips QC
told how evidence
1:19:45
presented by Professor Cameron
in a London murder trial was discredited.
1:19:49
Thats silly, sweetheart. Gran loves you.
1:19:52
- She wont let me play outside.
- Shes just doing what Mummy told her.
1:19:57
Its too dangerous
for you to play outside now.
1:20:02
Because were in the papers
so much and on the telly.
1:20:06
Silly people get silly ideas in their head.
1:20:09
We wouldnt want one of them
to come and get you, would we?
1:20:15
Yeah, wont be much longer now,
sweetheart.
1:20:23
(laughs)
1:20:25
Ive been looking at reactions
given by the different antisera
1:20:29
against the blood samples
taken from the car.
1:20:33
I think the court is familiar from the past
1:20:36
that the antiserum
known as antihaemoglobin
1:20:39
has in it antibodies that react with
both the alpha and beta molecular chains
1:20:44
which are found in haemoglobins.
1:20:47
For example, a sample could have been
obtained from the babys clothing.
1:20:51
Such a model would have made a perfect
control to see if your serum was working.
1:20:56
Jesus, how many more days of this?