1:40:04
WeII... Uh...
1:40:09
She's acceptabIe, Your Honour.
1:40:14
Your Honour, this is a picture taken
by my fiancée outside the Sac-o-Suds.
1:40:19
Can we agree on this?
1:40:22
- Yeah.
- Thank you.
1:40:25
I'd Iike to submit this picture
of the tyre tracks as evidence.
1:40:30
Mr Trotter.
1:40:33
No objection, Your Honour.
1:40:41
- Miss Vito. Did you take this picture?
- You know I did.
1:40:45
- And what is this picture of?
- You know what it's of.
1:40:48
Miss Vito, it has been
argued by me, the defence,...
1:40:53
..that two sets of guys met up
at the Sac-o-Suds, at the same time,...
1:40:58
..driving identicaI metaIIic mint-green
1964 Buick SkyIark convertibIes.
1:41:05
Now, can you teII us,
by what you see in this picture,...
1:41:09
..if the defence's case hoIds water?
1:41:19
Miss Vito. PIease answer the question.
1:41:23
Does the defence's case hoId water?
1:41:31
No.
1:41:33
- The defence is wrong.
- (murmuring)
1:41:38
- Are you sure?
- I'm positive.
1:41:43
How couId you be so sure?
1:41:46
Because there is no way that these
tyre marks were made by a '64 Buick SkyIark.
1:41:50
These marks were made
by a 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
1:41:54
Objection. Can we cIarify whether
the witness is stating opinion or fact?
1:41:59
- This is your opinion?
- It's a fact.