:21:02
That's it?
That's all you got for me?
:21:05
No, "Wow, nice helicopter"? No, " Hey,
great article in Sports Illustrated"?
:21:10
How's Donna doing?
Does she miss me?
:21:13
Twice in one year, Charlie.
What do you want this time?
:21:18
I come bearing
the New York Rangers.
:21:22
The New York Rangers?
:21:25
Yeah, I was pretty blown away myself.
:21:28
But the article sparked some kind
of brainstorm at the NHL.
:21:31
- Good writing, I guess.
- The New York Rangers.
:21:35
The New York Rangers.
:21:37
- In Mystery, Alaska?
- Right here.
:21:39
To play against our boys?
:21:41
The NHL feels it'll be
great publicity,
:21:43
and the network figures
a 14 share, minimum.
:21:47
All right.
:21:50
What's in it for you,
Charlie?
:21:53
Community pride.
:21:55
A sense of giving back to
the place where I grew up.
:21:59
Money.
:22:09
If you all settle down, we'll, uh,
we'll try to answer all your questions.
:22:14
Now, nothing is definite.
:22:16
There's still some dealing to be done
with the players' unions and things.
:22:20
But what needs to be decided first is,
do we want this game?
:22:24
- I won't kid ya, it would be
a goose to the economy.
:22:28
What economy?
:22:31
We can be serious
about this,
:22:34
or we can simply leave the decision to
the committee, which I'm quite happy to do.
:22:37
Yes, Miram?
:22:40
The question is,
do we really stand a chance?
:22:44
'Cause if all that's gonna happen
is we'll get laughed at,
:22:47
I'm not for it
at any price.
:22:50
That's fair. That's fair.
And to answer that,
:22:52
I'd like to call up here
someone we all know and...
:22:56
Well, we all know.
Charles Danner.